Assessment procedures form a critical foundation for effective behavior-analytic intervention. As an RBT, you will assist in implementing various assessments under the direction of a BCBA supervisor. Understanding different assessment types, procedural integrity, and accurate data collection is essential for this content area.
B-1: Conduct Preference Assessments
Purpose and Types of Preference Assessments
Definition and Purpose: Preference assessments systematically identify items, activities, or stimuli that may function as reinforcers for an individual. These procedures help:
- Identify potential reinforcers for behavior change programs
- Establish a hierarchy of preferences (high to low)
- Track changes in preferences over time
- Minimize reliance on arbitrary reinforcer selection
Common Types of Preference Assessments:
Single-Stimulus (SS):
- Presents items one at a time
- Measures approach/consumption/engagement
- Advantages: Simple, quick, useful for individuals with limited discrimination skills
- Disadvantages: Does not establish hierarchy, may overestimate preferences
Paired-Stimulus (PS) / Forced-Choice:
- Presents items in pairs
- Individual selects one item from each pair
- All possible pairs presented
- Creates preference hierarchy based on selection percentage
- Advantages: Establishes clear hierarchy, relatively quick
- Disadvantages: More complex than SS, requires discrimination skills
Multiple-Stimulus Without Replacement (MSWO):
- Array of items presented simultaneously
- Individual selects one item
- Selected item removed and remaining items rearranged
- Process continues until all items selected or no selection made
- Advantages: Establishes hierarchy quickly, fewer trials than paired-stimulus
- Disadvantages: Requires scanning skills, may be overwhelming with many items
Multiple-Stimulus With Replacement (MSW):
- Array of items presented simultaneously
- Individual selects one item
- All items (including selected one) rearranged for next trial
- Advantages: Controls for positional bias
- Disadvantages: Time-intensive, may not produce clear hierarchy
Free-Operant Observation:
- Various items available simultaneously for extended period
- Measure time engaged with each item
- Advantages: Naturalistic, minimal interference with access
- Disadvantages: Time-intensive, requires continuous observation
Implementation Procedures
General Preparation Steps:
- Identify potential reinforcers through interviews, observations
- Gather all materials before beginning
- Minimize distractions in assessment area
- Review specific protocol with supervisor
- Prepare data collection sheets
Paired-Stimulus Assessment Implementation:
- Place two items equidistant from individual and each other
- Deliver instruction: “Pick one” or “Which one do you want?”
- Allow 5 seconds for response
- Provide brief access to selected item (30 seconds)
- Record selection
- Repeat with all possible pairs in randomized order
- Calculate percentage of times each item selected (selections ÷ presentations × 100)
MSWO Assessment Implementation:
- Arrange 5-7 items in a semicircle equidistant from individual
- Deliver instruction: “Pick one”
- Allow 5 seconds for response
- Provide brief access to selected item (30 seconds)
- Remove selected item, rearrange remaining items
- Repeat until all items selected or no selection made
- Complete 3-5 sessions and average rankings
Data Collection Example:
Client: _______ Date: _______ Assessor: _______
Assessment Type: MSWO
Items: Tablet, Bubbles, Ball, Music, Puzzle, Crayons
Session 1:
1st selection: Tablet
2nd selection: Music
3rd selection: Bubbles
4th selection: Ball
5th selection: Puzzle
6th selection: Crayons (by process of elimination)
Session 2:
1st selection: Tablet
2nd selection: Bubbles
3rd selection: Music
4th selection: Puzzle
5th selection: Ball
6th selection: Crayons (by process of elimination)
Session 3:
1st selection: Music
2nd selection: Tablet
3rd selection: Bubbles
4th selection: Ball
5th selection: Puzzle
6th selection: No selection made
Average Rankings:
Tablet: 1.33
Music: 2.00
Bubbles: 2.67
Ball: 4.33
Puzzle: 4.67
Crayons: 6.00
Common Implementation Challenges
Competing Environmental Stimuli:
- Challenge: Individual distracted by items in environment
- Solution: Conduct assessment in minimally stimulating environment
- Documentation: Note environmental conditions that may affect results
Multiple/Simultaneous Selections:
- Challenge: Individual attempts to select multiple items
- Solution: Block access to secondary items, reinstate trial if necessary
- Documentation: Note multiple selection attempts in comments
No Selection Responding:
- Challenge: Individual does not select any items
- Solution: Consider alternative assessment format, check motivation
- Documentation: Record “no selection” for affected trials
Position Bias:
- Challenge: Individual consistently selects items in specific position
- Solution: Systematically vary item positions
- Documentation: Note position patterns for supervisor review
B-2: Assist with Functional Behavior Assessment Procedures
ABC (Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence) Data Collection
Purpose and Description: ABC data collection involves the systematic observation and recording of:
- Antecedents: Environmental events occurring immediately before the target behavior
- Behaviors: Detailed, objective description of the target behavior
- Consequences: Events occurring immediately after the target behavior
This narrative format helps identify patterns and potential functions of behavior.
Implementation Steps:
- Prepare ABC data sheet with columns for time, antecedents, behaviors, and consequences
- Observe client in relevant environments
- When target behavior occurs, immediately record:
- Specific environmental events immediately preceding behavior
- Detailed description of the behavior itself
- Events that followed the behavior (including natural consequences)
- Note exact times when possible
- Remain objective and avoid interpretations
ABC (Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence) Data Collection
Example ABC Data:
Client: _______ Date: _______ Observer: _______
Setting: Classroom during math instruction
Time | Antecedent | Behavior | Consequence
--------|----------------------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------
9:15 AM | Teacher gives worksheet with | Client crumples paper, | Teacher provides one-on-one
| 20 double-digit multiplication | throws on floor, says | assistance, reduces task to
| problems | "This is too hard" | 5 problems
| | |
9:47 AM | Peer obtains teacher | Client raises voice saying | Teacher provides attention,
| attention for completed work | "Look at mine too" | offers praise for work
| | |
10:22 AM| Teacher announces 5 minutes | Client puts head down | Task requirement delayed,
| left to complete assignment | on desk, refuses to respond | allowed to finish during break
| | to prompts |
Pattern Identification: After collecting multiple instances, review data to identify:
- Common antecedents preceding behavior
- Typical consequences following behavior
- Environmental patterns (times, settings, people)
- Potential function hypotheses based on patterns
Structured ABC Form Implementation
Advantages Over Narrative Format:
- More efficient for frequent behaviors
- Easier to identify patterns visually
- Allows for quantitative analysis
- Standardizes observation categories
Common Structured Categories:
Antecedent Categories:
- Presented with task/demand
- Denied access to item/activity
- Attention diverted to others
- Transition between activities
- Presence of specific people
- Environmental changes (noise, lighting)
Behavior Categories (based on operational definitions):
- Aggression
- Self-injury
- Property destruction
- Elopement
- Vocal disruption
- Non-compliance
Consequence Categories:
- Obtained attention
- Escaped/avoided task
- Obtained item/activity
- Sensory stimulation
- No apparent consequence
- Other (specify)
Structured Form Example:
Client: _______ Date: _______ Observer: _______
Time Period: 9:00-11:00 AM
Setting: Classroom
Time | Antecedent Category | Behavior Category | Consequence Category
------|---------------------|-------------------|---------------------
9:15 | Presented task | Property destruct.| Escaped task
9:47 | Attention to peers | Vocal disruption | Obtained attention
10:22 | Presented task | Non-compliance | Escaped task
Scatterplot Assessment
Purpose and Description: Scatterplot assessments document patterns of behavior occurrence across time periods to identify temporal patterns or correlations with environmental events.
Implementation Steps:
- Create a grid with time periods (rows) and days (columns)
- Observe and record behavior occurrence during each time period
- Note intensity or frequency using predetermined rating system
- Identify patterns across time periods and days
- Connect patterns to environmental events (activities, staffing, etc.)
Example Scatterplot Format:
Client: _______ Date Range: 4/1-4/5 Observer: _______
Behavior: Aggressive behavior (hitting, kicking, biting)
Rating: 0=None, 1=Low (1-2 occurrences), 2=Moderate (3-5), 3=High (6+)
Time | Monday | Tuesday | Wednesday | Thursday | Friday
--------|--------|---------|-----------|----------|--------
8:00-9:00| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0
9:00-10:00| 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2
10:00-11:00| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0
11:00-12:00| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0
12:00-1:00| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0
1:00-2:00| 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3
Pattern Analysis:
- Behavior consistently higher during 9:00-10:00 and 1:00-2:00
- These time periods correspond to math instruction and independent work periods
- Suggests possible task avoidance function
B-3: Assist with Functional Analysis Procedures
Functional Analysis Basics
Definition and Purpose: Functional analysis (FA) is a systematic process of experimentally manipulating environmental variables to identify functional relationships between behaviors and specific environmental conditions. FAs provide the most rigorous evidence for behavior function.
Key Distinctions:
- Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA): General term for various assessment procedures
- Functional Analysis (FA): Specific experimental analysis with controlled conditions
- Experimental Functional Analysis: Full analysis with all standard conditions
- Brief Functional Analysis: Abbreviated version with fewer trials
RBT Role in Functional Analysis:
- Implementing precisely defined protocols as designed by BCBA
- Following specific condition guidelines with procedural integrity
- Recording data accurately during sessions
- Maintaining safety procedures throughout assessment
- Not designing or modifying protocols independently
Standard Functional Analysis Conditions
Attention Condition:
- Purpose: Tests if behavior is maintained by social positive reinforcement (attention)
- Setup: Low attention environment, attention delivered contingent on target behavior
- Implementation:
- Tell client, “I have some work to do” or similar statement
- Engage in other activity, minimize attention
- Contingent on target behavior, provide brief attention (10-30 seconds)
- Return to minimal attention after delivery
- Record occurrences of target behavior
Escape Condition:
- Purpose: Tests if behavior is maintained by social negative reinforcement (escape from demands)
- Setup: Continuous presentation of demands with brief breaks contingent on problem behavior
- Implementation:
- Present demands consistently using three-step prompting
- Contingent on target behavior, remove demands for brief period (30 seconds)
- After break, reintroduce demands
- Record occurrences of target behavior
Tangible Condition:
- Purpose: Tests if behavior is maintained by access to items/activities
- Setup: Preferred items visible but not accessible, delivered contingent on target behavior
- Implementation:
- Keep preferred items visible but out of reach
- Contingent on target behavior, provide brief access (30 seconds)
- Remove item after access period
- Record occurrences of target behavior
Alone/Ignore Condition:
- Purpose: Tests if behavior is maintained by automatic reinforcement
- Setup: Minimal environmental stimulation, no social consequences
- Implementation:
- Place client in setting with minimal stimulation
- No interaction or consequences delivered for behavior
- Record occurrences of target behavior
- Prioritize safety monitoring
Control/Play Condition:
- Purpose: Serves as comparison condition with minimized motivation for problem behavior
- Setup: Free access to preferred items, attention, and no demands
- Implementation:
- Provide noncontingent access to preferred items
- Deliver attention every 30 seconds
- No demands presented
- Ignore problem behavior
- Record occurrences of target behavior
Procedural Integrity in Functional Analysis
Critical Elements for RBT Implementation:
- Condition Adherence: Implementing each condition exactly as designed
- Consequence Consistency: Delivering consequences only as specified
- Timing Accuracy: Maintaining specified durations for conditions and consequences
- Data Precision: Recording behavior occurrences with temporal accuracy
- Environmental Control: Minimizing unplanned environmental variables
Common Implementation Errors:
- Delivering attention during alone/ignore conditions
- Inconsistent application of three-step prompting in escape condition
- Variable timing of consequence delivery
- Failing to return to condition after delivering consequence
- Inadvertent reinforcement of behaviors other than targets
Safety Considerations:
- Always prioritize client and staff safety over procedural purity
- Know crisis intervention procedures before beginning
- Establish clear termination criteria for dangerous behavior
- Maintain supervision visibility throughout sessions
- Document any safety-related deviations from protocol
B-4: Assist with Skill Assessments
Types of Skill Assessments
Standardized Assessments:
- Formal assessments with normative data
- Published protocols with specific administration guidelines
- Examples: VB-MAPP, ABLLS-R, AFLS, Vineland-3
Curriculum-Based Assessments:
- Directly linked to intervention curricula
- Assess skills in sequence of teaching progression
- Examples: Program-specific assessments, academic curriculum assessments
Task Analyses:
- Break complex skills into component steps
- Assess performance on each component
- Examples: Self-care routines, vocational tasks, complex academic skills
Naturalistic Observations:
- Assessment in natural contexts
- Focus on functional application of skills
- Examples: Playground observations, mealtime assessments, community skills
Implementation Procedures
General Implementation Guidelines:
- Review assessment protocol thoroughly before beginning
- Gather all required materials and data sheets
- Arrange environment according to protocol specifications
- Minimize distractions during assessment
- Follow exact presentation procedures as specified
- Record responses precisely according to scoring criteria
- Maintain neutral affect during administration
- Do not provide feedback about correctness unless specified
- Adhere to starting/stopping rules in protocol
Prompting Considerations:
- Provide only prompts specified in protocol
- Record prompted vs. independent responses distinctly
- Avoid unintentional prompting (facial expressions, eye gaze)
- Follow specific error correction procedures if indicated
Data Collection Requirements:
- Record exact responses, not just correct/incorrect
- Note qualitative aspects of performance when relevant
- Document environmental factors affecting performance
- Maintain verbatim records of verbal responses when required
- Include latency, duration, or other dimensions if specified
Common Skill Assessment Types and Implementation
Discrete Trial Assessment:
- Structured presentation of individual items
- Clear discriminative stimuli and response requirements
- Implementation:
- Present stimulus exactly as specified
- Wait for response or until response interval elapses
- Record response according to scoring criteria
- Provide consequence as specified (often neutral)
- Maintain intertrial interval before next item
Probe Assessment:
- Testing performance without prior instruction
- Assessing maintenance of previously mastered skills
- Implementation:
- Present target skill opportunity without teaching
- Record response accuracy, independence, etc.
- Provide minimal feedback (unless otherwise specified)
- Test multiple exemplars of same skill when possible
Natural Environment Assessment:
- Assessment during typical activities
- Focus on functional application of skills
- Implementation:
- Arrange natural opportunities or contrive situations
- Observe response to natural cues
- Record occurrence/nonoccurrence of target skills
- Note contextual variables affecting performance
- Allow natural consequences when possible
Task Analysis Assessment:
- Evaluation of each step in complex sequence
- Focus on both accuracy and independence
- Implementation:
- Present initial discriminative stimulus
- Observe performance of each step
- Record performance level on each component (independent, verbal prompt, gesture prompt, physical prompt, etc.)
- Allow sufficient time between steps
- Complete entire sequence regardless of errors (unless protocol specifies otherwise)
Skill Assessment Challenges and Solutions
Motivational Challenges:
- Challenge: Client disengaged from assessment process
- Solution: Intersperse easy items, provide breaks, embed in preferred activities
- Documentation: Note motivational variables affecting performance
Instructional History Effects:
- Challenge: Previous teaching affecting assessment responses
- Solution: Use novel examples, vary presentation from teaching format
- Documentation: Record relevant instructional history information
Environmental Distractions:
- Challenge: External stimuli interfering with assessment
- Solution: Minimize distractions, reschedule if necessary
- Documentation: Note environmental conditions affecting results
Prompt Dependency:
- Challenge: Client waiting for prompts before responding
- Solution: Maintain neutral wait time, follow protocol regarding prompts
- Documentation: Record patterns of prompt-waiting behavior